Single judge allowed bail in an IPC case, holding that the long custody and delayed trial justified enlargement, without expressing opinion on merits.
Released on bail via personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:14263]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
28/2024
Jitendra @ Jeetu S/o Gajanand, R/o Near Water Tank, Kagji Devara, Bundi, Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Bundi)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. For : Mr. Riyasat Ali, P.P. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
21/03/2024
This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.393/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Section(s) 341, 323, 324, 308, 34 of IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that it is the case of version and cross-version and charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits
[2024:RJ-JP:14263]
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-28/2024]
that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Jitendra @ Jeetu S/o Gajanand shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
YOGESH KUMAR /110
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is admissible to regular bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, and 34 of IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jitendra @ Jeetu S/o Gajanand
The State Of Rajasthan
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
