Allowed

Ramniwas S/O Jagannath v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Mar 2024CRLMB/2649/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by two accused in a Bundi FIR involving offences of attempted culpable homicide and related offences. Considering overall facts without commenting on merits, the High Court allowed the application and directed release on furnishing personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 each with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

Ramniwas S/O Jagannath Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:12796]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

2649/2024

¶5

Ramniwas S/o Jagannath, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Neem Ka Kheda, Police Station Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi).

¶6

Omprakash S/o Chhitarlal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Neem Ka Kheda, Police Station Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi).

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun, Adv.
	Ms. Indu Shekhawat, Adv.
For	: Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma,
Respondent(s)	PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Order

¶14

14/03/2024

¶15

This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.505/2022 registered at Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Section(s) 308, 341, 323, 324, 325 & 143 of IPC.

[2024:RJ-JP:12796]

(2 of 3)

[CRLMB-2649/2024]

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶21

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners namely, 1. Ramniwas S/o Jagannath 2. Omprakash S/o Chhitarlal shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent

¶23

[2024:RJ-JP:12796] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2649/2024]

¶24

dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

¶25

so.

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

GAURAV SHARMA /05

Ramniwas S/O Jagannath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramniwas S/O Jagannath v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuber Singh Meena @ Raju Meena S/O Ram Vilas Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Kamli Devi W/O Shimbhu Dayal Vs Babu Lal S/O Murlidhar

Mahesh Sharma S/O Gopal Lal Sharma Vs Manjulika Srivastav W/O Sunil Srivastav

Smt.Chappali @ Champa and Ors. Vs Stae

Kamlesh Mahanand S/O Shri Raghu Mahanand Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaiprakash @ Pintu S/O Heeralal Vs State of Rajasthan