Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. withdrawn at counsel's request with liberty to surrender before the concerned court; the court expected any fresh bail application to be decided the same day.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:22850]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
2291/2024
Bablu Kumar S/o Late Sudhir Sharma, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Sakim Sasanbediya, Kali Mandir Ke Samne, Post And Police Station Nirsa, District Dhanbhad, Jharkhand.
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj, Adv. For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
14/05/2024
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with liberty to him to surrender before the concerned Court.
Permission as sought for is granted.
This bail application filed under Section 438Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[2024:RJ-JP:22850] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2291/2024]
However, if the petitioner surrenders himself and file the bail application before the concerned Court, it is expected from the concerned court to decide the bail application of the petitioner preferably on the same day, in accordance with law.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
GAURAV SHARMA /202
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bablu Kumar
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
