Allowed

Gulshan Jatav @ Kabir S/O Sultan Jatav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Mar 2024CRLMB/2234/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. allowed. Petitioner charged under IPC and Arms Act granted bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties. Court deemed it just and proper without commenting on merits.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Gulshan Jatav @ Kabir S/O Sultan Jatav Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:11730]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

2234/2024

¶5

Gulshan Jatav @ Kabir S/o Sultan Jatav, Aged About 23 Years, R/o House No. 12 Sunita Coloni Maal Ki Dhani Sanganer Jaipur P.s. Malpura Gate Jaipur East. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mahesh Chand Meena,
	Adv.
For	: Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma,
Respondent(s)	P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

07/03/2024

¶14

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.292/2023 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 336, 307, 427, 504 & 458 IPC and under Section(s) 3/25(1-b) (a) of Arms Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been

[2024:RJ-JP:11730]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-2234/2024]

falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶21

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Gulshan Jatav @ Kabir S/o Sultan Jatav shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

DANISH USMANI /18

Gulshan Jatav @ Kabir S/O Sultan Jatav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulshan Jatav @ Kabir S/O Sultan Jatav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra @ Kalu S/O Late Shri Joshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Deshraj Son of Shri Ramjilal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Lokendra Singh @ Lauki S/O Shri Bhupendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Khatik @ Bakara S/O Late Madan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhanpati W/O Mukesh Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh Saini S/O Shankarlal Vs the State of Rajasthan