Bail application of an accused in judicial custody was dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared to argue on two consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2051/2024
Ram Narayan S/o Laluram @ Lala, R/o Gram Dhaba, Police Station Ghatoli, District Jhalawar(Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
24/05/2024
On 20.04.2024, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to argue the case.
Today also, no one has put in appearance even in second round on behalf of the petitioner to argue the case.
Thus, the criminal miscellaneous bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
ANAND TANWAR /41
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should proceed when no one appears for the petitioner on two consecutive occasions.
Ram Narayan S/o Laluram @ Lala
State Of Rajasthan
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
