Allowed

Irfan Son of Asgardeen @ Asgar, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Mar 2024CRLMB/1856/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan granted regular bail to two accused petitioners confined in judicial custody. The court deemed it just and proper to enlarge them on a personal bond with sureties upon a prima facie view of the facts, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the charges.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Irfan Son of Asgardeen @ Asgar, Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:11580]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

1856/2024

¶5

Irfan Son Of Asgardeen @ Asgar, R/o Village Kherli Gazi, Police Station Jurhara, Presently Resident Of Lalpur, Police Station Kaman District Deeg. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2190/2024

¶12

Majid @ Majji S/o Kadu, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Sablana, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶16

----Respondent

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, Respondent(s) PP

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

Order

06/03/2024

[2024:RJ-JP:11580]

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-1856/2024]

¶23

These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.690/2023 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Section(s) 3/8 of R.B.A. Act.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that the accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶25

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the same.

¶26

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶27

Therefore, these bail applications are allowed and accused-petitioners namely, 1. Irfan Son Of Asgardeen @ Asgar 2. Majid @ Majji S/o Kadu

¶28

are ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of

¶29

[2024:RJ-JP:11580] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1856/2024]

¶30

Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶31

A copy of this order be placed in each connected file.

¶32

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶33

GAURAV SHARMA /54-55

Irfan Son of Asgardeen @ Asgar, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Irfan Son of Asgardeen @ Asgar, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupendra Singh S/O Shri Kishan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Ajrudin Son of Babbudin Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Kavita Devi W/O Late Shri Noratmal Vs Suresh Chand S/O Shri Kishan

Jitendra @ Kalu S/O Late Shri Joshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Deshraj Son of Shri Ramjilal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Lokendra Singh @ Lauki S/O Shri Bhupendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan