The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the bail application. The court held that ample material established the petitioner's complicity and cited the embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act to refuse bail. The witness recording was directed to be expedited.
Bail application dismissed; bail refused to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:19221]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous III Bail Application No. 1792/2024
Ramesh Kumar S/o Ladu Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Siyako Ki Beri, Aaleti, Dhorimanna Ps, Dist Barmer. (Lodged In Dist Jail, Sirohi)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Kishan Lal Vishnoi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA |
| Mr. Prabhu Dayal,Addl. SP Sirohi |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
02/05/2024
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-1792/2024]
[2024:RJ-JD:19221]
(FARJAND ALI),J
685-divya/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner considering evidence of complicity and statutory embargo.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramesh Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
