The High Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw their anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with liberty to surrender before the concerned Court, expecting immediate consideration.
Permission granted to withdraw anticipatory bail application with liberty to surrender and expect immediate bail consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:8273]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
171/2024
----Petitioners Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailender Singh Balwada, Adv. For : Mr. Yashwant Kankhediya, P.P. Respondent(s) Mr. Susheel Pujari, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
16/02/2024
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to
[2024:RJ-JP:8273] (2 of 2)
[CRLMB-171/2024]
withdraw this anticipatory bail application with liberty to them to surrender before the concerned Court.
Permission as sought for is granted.
This bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
However, if the petitioners surrender themselves and file the bail application before the concerned Court, it is expected from the concerned court to decide the bail application of the petitioners preferably on the same day, in accordance with law.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
YOGESH KUMAR /80
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hariram @ Hari Singh
Maniram
Surendra
Nandkishor
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
