Allowed

Suraj v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Feb 2024CRLMB/1651/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two bail applications by accused in FIR No. 01/2024 registered at GRPF Chowki, Nokha Road, for offences under Sections 147 Railways Act and 3 RP(UP) Act. Court noted a co-accused had been granted bail on 12-02-2024 and the applicants' cases were identical. Both applications allowed; applicants released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh each plus two sureties of Rs. 50,000.

What did the court decide?

Both bail applications allowed; applicants to be released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh each and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Suraj Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:7903]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1651/2024

¶4

Suraj S/o Sh. Vipul, Aged About 22 Years, R/o B 363, Kanta Khaturiya Colony, P.S. Jai Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail Bikaner).

----Petitioner

Versus

Union of India GRPF

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1654/2024 Rajendra Prajapat S/o Narayan Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Shiv Bari Circle, Ghati Ke Upar, Street No. 5, P.S. Jai Narayan Vyas Colony Bikaner, Dist. Bikaner (Rajasthan). (Petitioner Is Presently Lodged At Central Jail Bikaner).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan 2. Union of India through Railway Security Force

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Amit Gour, Mr. Deependra Singh Shekhawat for Mr. Rajendra Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Sharwan Kumar, PP Mr. Prakash Raika for
		Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit Dy. SG(UOI)

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶17

Order

¶18

15/02/2024

¶19

tekur izkFkZuk i= ds okn”kh’kZd esa vizkFkhZ jktLFkku jkT; ds LFkku ij Hkkjr la?k dk uke izfrLFkkfir djus gsrq izLrqr izkFkZuk i=ksa ij lquk x;kA

¶20

izkFkZuk i=ksa esa of.kZr dkj.kksa dks ns[krs gq, nksuksa izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj izLrqr la”kksf/kr okn”kh’kZd dks vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA la”kksf/kr okn”kh’kZd i=koyh esa mfpr LFkku ij yxk;k tkosA

¶21

izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls tekur ds ;g nksuksa vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk

¶22

439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk vkjih,Q pkSdh uks[kk iksLV esM+rk jksM+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 01@2024] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 147 jsyos ,DV o 3 vkj ih ¼;wih½ ,DV ds ekeys esa izLrqr gq, gSA

¶23

geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

[2024:RJ-JD:7903]

[CRLMB-1651/2024]

(2 of 2)

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd lg vfHk;qDrx.k lksuw mQZ ehrw o iou dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur vkosnu la[;k 647@2024 bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 12-02-2024 dks Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZx.k dk ekeyk muls fHkUu ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k yEcs le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶28

blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd o Hkkjr la?k ds fo}ku vf/koDRkk us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶29

tekur vkosnu ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA lg vfHk;qDrx.k lksuw mQZ ehrw o iou dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur vkosnu la[;k 647@2024 bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 12-02-2024 dks Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZx.k dk ekeyk muls fHkUu ugha gksuk crk;k x;k gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA

¶30

cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶31

ifj.kker% nksuksa tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr 1-lwjt iq= Jh foiqy 2-jktsUnz iztkir iq= ukjk;.k jke mi;qZDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ekeys esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa izR;sd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mUgsa bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶32

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶33

8-9--S N LOHRA/-

Suraj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepika Vs State of Rajasthan

Sajjan Kunwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Zile Singh Beniwal Vs State

Rajendra Prajapat Vs State of Rajasthan

Shadab Shah Vs State of Rajasthan

Sukhvinder Singh Vs State of Rajasthan