Allowed

Khushiram S/O Dharm Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Dec 2024CRLMB/16420/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS for an NDPS Act FIR where recovery was less than commercial quantity. Considering the overall facts and prolonged judicial custody without trial delay prospects, the court enlarged the petitioner on bail with a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on personal bond Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to appear before trial Court as directed.

Khushiram S/O Dharm Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:52369]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

16420/2024

¶5

Khushiram S/o Dharm Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Khoyali, Police Station Garhmora, District Gangapur City (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail At Hindaun City).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Khushvendra Singh Rajawat, Adv., for Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv. For : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 20/12/2024

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.423/2024 registered at Police Station Todabhim, District Gangapur City for the offence(s) under Section(s) 8, 21, 29 of NDPS Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the alleged contraband recovered in the present case is less than commercial

[2024:RJ-JP:52369]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-16420/2024]

quantity. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the recovery of alleged contraband in the present case is less than commercial quantity, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Khushiram S/o Dharm Singh shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

YOGESH KUMAR/435

Khushiram S/O Dharm Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khushiram S/O Dharm Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manan Ojha S/O Yashvant Ojha Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam Husain S/O Anvar Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Govind @ Vikki S/O Shri Mahaveer Prasad Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravina and Others Vs Shriram Gen Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others

Akhter Huassain S/O Shri Rahmat Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh S/O Humla Vs State of Rajasthan