Allowed

Chainsingh S/O Sh. Ramswaroop v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Jan 2024CRLMB/16127/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under the NDPS Act involving less than commercial quantity, the court observed that the amount of contraband was not commensurate with the severity indicted and allowed regular bail conditioned upon a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

The accused-petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Chainsingh S/O Sh. Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2191]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

16127/2023

¶5

Chainsingh S/o Sh. Ramswaroop, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Govindpura, Ps Chhabra, Distt. Baran (Raj.). (Presently The Accused Petitioner Is In Sub Jail, Chhabra, Distt. Baran).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun, Adv. For : Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Asst. G.A. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

12/01/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.395/2023 registered at Police Station Chhabra, District Baran for the offence(s) under Section(s) 8/18 & 29 NDPS Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the amount of contraband involved in the present matter is less than commercial. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-16127/2023]

¶16

[2024:RJ-JP:2191]

¶17

judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Assistant Government Advocate appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the amount of contraband involved in the present matter is less than commercial, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Chainsingh S/o Sh. Ramswaroop shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

YOGESH KUMAR /23

Chainsingh S/O Sh. Ramswaroop v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chainsingh S/O Sh. Ramswaroop v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naveen @ Golu Son of Shri Daulat Mehra Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit Godala @ Kabootar S/O Shri Rajesh Godala Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dilip Singh S/O Poor Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Tinkal @ Tinku @ Tinka S/O Manglaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramvilas S/O Shri Badri Vs State of Rajasthan

Samundra S/O Mahaveer Vs State of Rajasthan