Allowed

Satish S/O Prahlad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Dec 2024CRLMB/16032/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench Bail applications filed by nine accused petitioners under Section 483 B.N.S.S. This Court, without expressing opinion on merits, deemed it just and proper to grant regular bail, subject to furnishing bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of all petitioners on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and complying with summons.

Satish S/O Prahlad Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:51995]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15522/2024

¶4

Mustkim Son Of Kamal Khan, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Bilond, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

¶5

Soyab Son Of Aazad, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Bilond, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present AccusedPetitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15523/2024

¶12

Rajak Son Of Ali Mohammad, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Bhuru Ka Vas, Sikri, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶16

----Respondent

¶17

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15524/2024

¶18

Rahul Son Of Subdi, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Karmuka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present AccusedPetitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

¶19

Kasam Son Of Mammal, Aged About 36 Years,

[CRLMB-15522/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:51995]

(2 of 4)

Resident Of Karmuka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present AccusedPetitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

¶24

Nijam Son Of Mammal, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Karmuka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present AccusedPetitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg)

¶25

----Petitioners

¶26

Versus

¶27

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶28

----Respondent

¶29

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15609/2024

¶30

Umesh S/o Pappu, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Bilond, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶31

----Petitioner

¶32

Versus

¶33

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶34

----Respondent

¶35

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15610/2024

¶36

Aasam S/o Fateh Mohammad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Nagla Imam Khan, Police Station Barsana, District Mathura, (Uttar Pradesh) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶37

----Petitioner

¶38

Versus

¶39

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶40

----Respondent

¶41

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶42

[2024:RJ-JP:51995]

¶43

(3 of 4) [CRLMB-15522/2024]

¶44

16032/2024

¶45

Satish S/o Prahlad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bilond, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Distt. Deeg).

¶46

----Petitioner

¶47

Versus

¶48

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶49

----Respondent

¶50

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma, Adv., for Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Hem Singh Rathore, Adv.

¶51

For : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶52

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 18/12/2024

¶53

These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.685/2024 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Section(s) 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and 66D of IT Act.

¶54

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. He further submits that the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the

¶55

[2024:RJ-JP:51995]

¶56

(4 of 4) [CRLMB-15522/2024]

¶57

trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶58

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications.

¶59

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶60

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners namely (1) Mustkim Son Of Kamal Khan, (2) Soyab Son Of Aazad, (3) Rajak Son Of Ali Mohammad, (4) Rahul Son Of Subdi, (5) Kasam Son Of Mammal, (6) Nijam Son Of Mammal, (7) Umesh S/o Pappu, (8) Aasam S/o Fateh Mohammad & (9) Satish S/o Prahlad shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶61

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶62

YOGESH KUMAR/298-303

Satish S/O Prahlad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish S/O Prahlad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Vijendra Singh S/O Shri Shyopal Meena, Vs Nisha Meena D/O Shri Mohan Lal Meena

Imran Mansoori S/O Shri Alisher Mansoori Vs State of Rajasthan

Sushil S/O Sh. Suryaprakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Balram @ Bantu S/O Jayshiv Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Kumar Meena S/O Nawalram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Premchand S/O Ratanlal Vs State of Rajasthan