This court granted a second bail application despite a delay in production of the accused, holding that his medical condition (debility) and committed high value pre bail bonds justified re-issuance.
Second bail order allowed on terms of existing bail bonds with additional security of Rs. 2 lacs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:51565]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 15815/2024
Jagdish @ Sethi S/o Kalla, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Harijan Basti, Bada Mohalla, Police Station Kotwali Gangapur City, District Gangapur City. (At Present Confined In District Jail Gangapur City).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K.Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P.Tiwari, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
16/12/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds vUrxZr viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk&i= iqfyl Fkkuk xaxkiqj flVh ftyk xaxkiqj flVh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 149@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@20 Lokid vkS"kf/k vkSj eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e 1985 esa is”k fd;k x;k gSA
cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDRkk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd mls izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izFke tekur izkFkZuk&i= bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 15-10-2024 dks fujLr fd;k x;k Fkk] mlds i'pkr izdj.k esa vkjksi fojfpr fd;k tkdj ,d vfHk;kstu lk{kh ijhf{kr gks pqdk gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 16-05-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] tks dkQh vf/kd vof/k gSA mlds fo:) iwoZ ds nks izdj.k Fks ftuesa ls ,d esa tCr'kqnk eknd inkFkZ dh ek=k U;wure ek=k 1 fdyks ls dqN gh vf/kd 1 fdyks 50 xzke FkhA bu ifjLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk,A
[2024:RJ-JP:51565]
[CRLMB-15815/2024]
(2 of 2)
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ is'k fd;k fd vfHk;qDr dh tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= fnukad 15-10-2024 dks fujLr fd;k x;k Fkk] mlds i'pkr~ izdj.k dh ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ,slk dksbZ lkjoku ifjorZu ugha gqvk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr tekur dk vf/kdkjh gksA iwoZ esa xq.kkoxq.k ij tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= fujLr fd;k tk pqdk gS] vr% tekur izkFkZuk&i= fujLr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
izLrqr rdksZA ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA
i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh tekur dk izFke izkFkZuk&i= bl U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 15-10-2024 dks leku izd`fr ds vijk/k ds vU; nks izdj.k yfEcr jgus ,oa tekur dh lqfo/kk dk nq:i;ksx djrs gq, vijk/k dkfjr djus ds vk/kkj ij fujLr fd;k x;k FkkA orZeku esa izdj.k esa vkjksi fojpuk gksus ,oa ,d vfHk;kstu lk{kh ds dFku ys[kc) gks tkus ek= ls vfHk;qDr ds i{k esa ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ,slk lkjoku ifjorZu ugha ekuk tk ldrk fd og tekur dk vf/kdkjh gks tk,A vfHk;qDr fnukad 16-5-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gksuk crk;k gS] tks vf/kd yEch vof/k Hkh ugha dgh tk ldrh gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur dk ;g f}rh; izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur dk ;g f}rh; izkFkZuk&i= vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail bond executed on 15.10.2024 remains valid given the delay in production of the accused.
Jagdish @ Sethi
State Of Rajasthan
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
