Allowed

Ajij @ Ajji S/O Umru v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Feb 2024CRLMB/1356/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan enlarged the petitioner on bail. The court found it just and proper to grant bail without expressing an opinion on the merits, allowing him to appear before the trial court on subsequent dates.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed; petitioner to execute personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/each.

Ajij @ Ajji S/O Umru Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1356/2024

¶3

Ajij @ Ajji S/o Umru, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Akata, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶10

Order

¶11

06/02/2024

¶12

The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.366/2021 Registered at Police Station Kaman, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) under Sections 3, 4 and 8 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animals Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since long. Similarly situated co-accused Umar has been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.06.2023 in S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.6484/2023. Conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

[CRLMB-1356/2024]

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Ajij @ Ajji S/o Umru be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he will appear before the trial court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶20

Gourav/15

Ajij @ Ajji S/O Umru v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajij @ Ajji S/O Umru v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Mehrishi Vs Bhikam Chand and Ors.

Irshad Ali @ Salim Abba S/O Late Shri Irfan Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Om Prakash Son of Shri Likharam Vs State of Rajasthan

Pappu S/O Shri Kalyana Vs State of Rajasthan

State of Rajasthan through District Collector Vs Om Prakash Verma S/O Shri Mahendra Singh Verma

Vikram @ Bhamu S/O Shri Ugrasen Vs State of Rajasthan