Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS for offences under Section 8/21 NDPS Act arising from recovery of 11.83 grams smack, a non-commercial quantity. Bail allowed without commenting on merits, subject to personal bond and two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:45809]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13415/2024
Mohammad Irfan @ Balla S/o Ashfaak Qureshi, Aged About 24 Years, R/o House Number 2/59, Qureshiyan Masjid Ke Paas, Ajad Nagar, Ghat Ki Guni, Police Station Transport Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Yunus Khan with Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
06/11/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:45809]
[CRLMB-13415/2024]
(2 of 3)
case is stated to be registered against the petitioner in which he has been enlarged on bail. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 12.10.2024. He has, thus, urges that further incarceration of the petitioner in this case would not serve any fruitful purpose. He, therefore, prays that instant bail application may be allowed and petitioner may also be enlarged on bail.
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:45809]
[CRLMB-13415/2024]
subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do
so.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
PAYAL DHAWAN /187
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused should be granted regular bail where the recovered contraband (11.83 grams smack) is non-commercial quantity.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohammad Irfan @ Balla S/o Ashfaak Qureshi
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Bhuwan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
