In a bail application under Section 439 CrPC, the Rajasthan High Court held that bail should not be granted where the petitioner failed to appear despite summons, and Rule 35 requirements were not met. The application was dismissed.
Bail application dismissed. Petitioner to appear before Magistrate as per summons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:16932]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1310/2024
Prasanna Devi Jangid W/o Late Shri Sitaram, R/o Village Fatehpura, Police Station Nainwa, District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Pt. Shri Ram Joshi, Adv. For : Mr. Sanjeev Mehla, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
09/04/2024
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrk dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq izLrqr f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;k rFkk vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
vfHk;qDrk ds fo:) vius izseh dh gR;k dkfjr djus dk vkjksi gS] foLr`r vkns'k ds ek/;e ls izFke tekur vkosnu fnukad 05-10-2023 dks vLohdkj fd;k x;k FkkA fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDrk dk fuosnu gS fd xokg ih-MCyw&1 'kadjyky ds c;kuksa esa vfHk;qDrk ds fo:) dksbZ lkjoku lk{; ugha vk;h gSA pwafd mDr xokg 'kadjyky ?kVuk dk izR;{kn'khZ
[2024:RJ-JP:16932]
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-1310/2024]
lk{kh ugha gS] ekeyk ifjfLFkfrtU; lk{; ij vk/kkfjr gSA vfHk;qDrk ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi vR;f/kd xaHkhj gSa] ,sls ekeyksa esa fu"i{k fopkj.k gksuk vko';d gSA izFke tekur vkosnu [kkfjt gksus ds i'pkr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ,slk lkjoku ifjorZu ugha vk;k gS ftlesa vfHk;qDrk dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;s tkus ij fopkj fd;k tk ldsA
vr% izLrqr rdks a Z] izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrk ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vk{ksiksa dh xaHkhjrk vkfn dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, bl izdze ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij foospu fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrk dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrk }kjk izLrqr f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /8
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who failed to appear in court despite repeated summons.
Whether the requirements of Rule 35 of the Rajasthan Prison Rules have been satisfied.
Prasanna Devi Jangid
State Of Rajasthan
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
