Allowed

Biharilal S/O Mohanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Oct 2024CRLMB/12321/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed bail applications filed by accused persons confined in judicial custody, releasing them on personal bonds with sureties. The court considered the long period in custody and the nature of offences without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted to petitioners with personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Biharilal S/O Mohanlal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:42958]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

12321/2024

¶5

Biharilal S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 15, Kasba Mandawa, Police Station Mandawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12322/2024

¶12

Rajendra Kumar @ Raju @ Rajkumar S/o Bhaguram @ Bhagirath, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Ward No. 15, Mandawa, Police Station Mandawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu).

¶13

Vinod @ Mota S/o Keshardev, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Nadipura, Ward No. 29, Nawalgarh, Presently Ward No. 15, Mandawa, Police Station Mandawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu).

¶14

----Petitioners

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶17

----Respondent

¶18

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Gajraj, Adv.

¶19

[2024:RJ-JP:42958] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12321/2024]

¶20

For : Mr. Devi Singh, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶21

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 10/10/2024

¶22

These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 of B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.116/2024 registered at Police Station Mandawa, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Section(s) 341, 323, 325, 427 & 308/34 of IPC.

¶23

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that accused-petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. He further submits that accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications.

¶25

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail.

¶26

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 of B.N.S.S. are allowed and

¶27

[2024:RJ-JP:42958] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12321/2024]

¶28

it is ordered that accused-petitioners 1.Biharilal S/o Mohanlal, 2.Rajendra Kumar @ Raju @ Rajkumar S/o Bhaguram @ Bhagirath & 3.Vinod @ Mota S/o Keshardev shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶29

A copy of this order be placed in connected file.

¶30

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶31

DANISH USMANI /09 & 10

Biharilal S/O Mohanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Biharilal S/O Mohanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Devi W/O Shri Radhey Shyam Vs Kalu Ram S/O Jita Ram

Jabra Ram S/O Shri Mada Ram, Vs the State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Prasad Meena S/O Shri Raja (Ram Meena, Vs Shri Sandeep Verma

Dilkhush @ Deendayal S/O Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

M/S Sh. Shantosh Traders Vs M/S Nushar India Future Touch Pvt. Ltd.

Rajendra Kumar @ Raju @ Rajkumar S/O Bhaguram @ Bhagirath Vs State of Rajasthan