Allowed

Rahul S/O Mehboob v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Oct 2024CRLMB/12018/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Uma Shanker Vyas allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. The Court held it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail, noting the recovered contraband was less than commercial quantity, without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail via personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Rahul S/O Mehboob Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:41845]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12018/2024

¶4

Rahul S/o Mehboob, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Dotana, Police Station Tijara, District Kherthal Tijara, District Kherthal Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Confined Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.K. Singhal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

01/10/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.450/2024 registered at Police Station Kishangarh Bas, District Kherthal Tijara for the offence(s) under Section(s) 8/20 of NDPS Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accusedpetitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the alleged contraband recovered in the present case is less than commercial quantity. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

[2024:RJ-JP:41845]

[CRLMB-12018/2024]

(2 of 2)

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the recovery of alleged contraband in the present case is less than commercial quantity, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accusedpetitioner Rahul S/o Mehboob shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

GAURAV SHARMA /282

Rahul S/O Mehboob v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul S/O Mehboob v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bijendra Saini S/O Shri Rambharosi, Vs State of Rajasthan

Jamila W/O Sammar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil S/O Kanaiyalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Heera @ Tahir Khan S/O Kallu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopilal Son of Kishanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Mahwar S/O Shri Jagdish, Vs State of Rajasthan