Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan dismissed bail applications filed by accused-petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. charged with robbery and forgery. Court noted criminal antecedents, gravity of offences, and lack of inclination to enlarge bail at trial stage.
Bail applications of accused-petitioners dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:23795]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.5556/2023
Ikram S/o Ilyash, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Jaimat, District Nuh (Mewat) Harayana.
At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1143/2024 1. Ajru S/o Rukdeen, Ro Jaimat, Tehsil Punhana, District Nuh (Mewat) Haryana,
At Present Confined At Sub Jail Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur.
At Present Confined At Sub Jail Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Hakim Ali, Adv. for Mr. Aneesh Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
20/05/2024
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:23795]
[CRLMB-5556/2023]
been arrested in connection with FIR No.525/2022, registered at Police Station Mojmabad, District Jaipur (Rural) for the offence(s) under Section 395 of IPC later on under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 473 of IPC were added.
(i) Accused-petitioner Ikram @ Akram;
| Sr. No. | Case No. | Under Section | Police Station |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 777/2014 | 379 and 411 IPC | Sohan Haryana |
| 2. | 435/2016 | 395 IPC | Kotkasim Alwar |
| 3. | 06/2017 | 365, 395 IPC | Gopalgarh Raj. |
| 4. | 474/2019 | HGS Act | FPJ |
| 5. | 525/23 | 395, 465, 467, 468, 471, 473 IPC |
Maujmabad Jiladudu |
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:23795]
[CRLMB-5556/2023]
| 6. 03/23 |
A. Act | Tavdu Hariyana |
|---|
(ii) Accused-petitioners Ajru and Sadar @ Safaruddin;
| Sr. No. | Case No. | Under Section | Police Station |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 88/20 | 379, 120B IPC | Bhusawar Bharatpur |
| 2. | 411/22 | 365, 397, 395, 201, 419, 420, 120B IPC |
Kasola District Revari Hariyana |
| 3. | 525/22 | 395, 465, 467, 468, 471, 473 IPC |
Maujmabad District Dudu |
| 4. | 03/23 | A. Act | Tavadu Hariyana |
Therefore, considering the gravity of offences, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be dismissed.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-37-38
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to accused-petitioners charged with robbery and using an ATM card without identification proceedings.
Whether the criminal antecedents of the petitioners warrant denial of bail in a serious offence involving robbery and abduction.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
IKRAM NIYAZ /NIYAZ /@AKRAM
AJRU /AJRU S/O RUKDEEN
SADAR @ SAFARUDDIN /SAFARUDDIN
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
