HC Jaipur dismissed bail application of a petitioner convicted of Arson under Section 303(2) Indian Penal Code 2023, where trial is pending. Court observed availability of medical facility sufficed; bail not allowed.
Bail Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:46863]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11116/2024
Aalam Shekh S/o Idu Khan, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Manpura, P.s. Moujmabad, District Dudu - Raj. ( Accused - Petitioner Is Confide In The Sub- Jail- Sambher Lack, District- Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atul Kumar Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. O.S.Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
13/11/2024
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vkye 'ks[k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ¼/kkjk 439 naM izfdz;k lafgrk½ ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk& nwnw] ftyk& nwnw esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 195@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 303¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk] 2023 esa is’k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us dFku fd;k fd izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls izdj.k esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS ,oa mlls dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izLrqr ekeys esa lg&vfHk;qDr ln~nhd [kku dh tekur fopkj.k U;k;y; }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk izdj.k mlls fHkUu ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) tks iwoZ esa 8 izdj.k ntZ gksuk crk;k x;k gS] muesa og tekur ij vktkn gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 08-08-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gS ,oa mlds fo:) vkjksi&i=
[2024:RJ-JP:46863]
[CRLMB-11116/2024]
(2 of 2)
U;k;ky; esa izLrqr gks pqdk gS] ftlds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA
eSaus i=koyh dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;kA
gLrxr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk /kkjk 303¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk] 2023 ds vkjksi esa vkjksi&i= U;k;ky; esa izLrqr gksdj mldk fnukad 08-08-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gksuk izdV gksrk gS] lkFk gh izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ esa ntZ 8 izdj.kksa esa mldk tekur ij vktkn gksuk] izdj.k esa lg&vfHk;qDr ln~nhd [kku dh tekur fopkj.k U;k;ky; ls gksuk ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk izdj.k mlls fHkUu ugha gksuk crk;k x;k gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA
vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vkye 'ks[k iq= bnq [kku dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
DEEPAK SAINI /288(S)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC given the serious nature of the charge and trial pending at special court.
Whether the Availability of Medical Facility constitutes sufficient cause for granting bail despite the 8-year delay.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Aalam Shekh
State Of Rajasthan
BHUWAN GOYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
