Allowed

Rahul @ Bittu S/O Shri Nagarmal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Sept 2024CRLMB/10650/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur allowed a second regular bail application filed by an accused petitioner charged under Section 394 IPC. The court deemed it just and proper to grant bail after the charge sheet was filed, subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

The accused-petitioner is released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Rahul @ Bittu S/O Shri Nagarmal Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:36680]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No.

¶4

10650/2024

¶5

Rahul @ Bittu S/o Shri Nagarmal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Dhani Cholyawali, Village Bawdi Police Station Reengus, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Neem Ka Thana).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surya Pratap Singh, Adv. For : Mr. Devi Singh, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

02/09/2024

¶13

This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. seeking regular bail in FIR No.64/2024 registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Section 394 IPC.

¶14

The first bail application of the accusedpetitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 26.07.2024, giving liberty to the accused-petitioner to file afresh after filing of the charge sheet.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed. He also submits

[CRLMB-10650/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:36680]

(2 of 2)

that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶21

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that charge sheet has been filed, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Rahul @ Bittu S/o Shri Nagarmal shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

DANISH USMANI /05

Rahul @ Bittu S/O Shri Nagarmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul @ Bittu S/O Shri Nagarmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sunita W/O Kuldeep, Vs 1/1. Heeralal S/O Banshi

Bhawani Singh Rajawat S/O Late Shri Sumer Singh Rajawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Kumar @ R.K. S/O Ramprasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Ratni Devi W/O Late Madanlal Vs Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd.

Magma H D I Gen Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt Laxma Devi and Ors.

Smt Anita Devi and Ors. Vs Ramashi and Ors.