A two-judge bench of the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur heard a bail application filed under Section 438 CrPC/482 BNSS. The learned counsel submitted that the application had become infructuous. The court dismissed the application for being infructuous.
The criminal miscellaneous bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:36315]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena, Adv. For : Mr. Devi Singh, P.P. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
30/08/2024
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that this criminal misc. bail application has become infructuous.
In view of above, the criminal misc. bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C./482 B.N.S.S. is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DANISH USMANI /06
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous bail application has become infructuous in view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dharamsingh
Anil
Deepak
State Of Rajasthan
UMA SHANKER VYAS
DANISH USMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
