Pre-arrest bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur due to the petitioner taking different stands in the matter, rendering it unfit for anticipatory bail.
Benefits of pre-arrest bail were not granted to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:6255]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1037/2024
Bhuvnesh @ Bhuvneshwar Sharma S/o Shri Rajendra Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 3 Dh 313, Rajput Colony, Jai Ambe Nagar, Rangbadi, Kota (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP Mr. Amit Dadhich
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
06/02/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:6255]
[CRLMB-1037/2024]
petitioner is not required in this matter. He thus prays that benefit of pre-arrest bail may be granted to the petitioner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
GAUTAM JAIN /31
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with offences under Sections 420 and 447 of IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhuvnesh @ Bhuvneshwar Sharma
The State Of Rajasthan
Pradeep Singh
Smt. Laad Kanwar
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
