HC at Jodhpur granted bail to Vinod arrested under Section 376 IPC. The court considered representations regarding false implication, 2-year FIR delay, and live-in relationship, finding it just and proper to release the applicant against a bond.
Accused enlarged on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:35880]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10230/2024
Vinod S/o Shri Raju, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Lahoriya, Police Station Semari, District Salumbar. (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Bharat Shrimali |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Narendra Gehlot,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
30/08/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:35880]
[CRLMB-10230/2024]
(2 of 2)
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
45-Arti/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be allowed given the delay in FIR and live-in relationship context.
Whether the applicant deserves enlargement on bail considering he is behind bars.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinod
The State Of Rajasthan
Yogendra Kumar Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
