In a bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., the High Court allowed bail for the accused, holding that continued incarceration served no fruitful purpose given the co-accused had been granted bail.
Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:35771]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10048/2024
Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Choth Mal Saini, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Aantela Police Station Bhabru District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Kotputli).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary with Mr. S.K. Lamba For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
27/08/2024
The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No. 512/2022 registered at Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur Rural, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 420, 406 & 120B I.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is behind the bars since 29.07.2024. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court. The case is exclusively triable by a Court of Magistrate. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude. Till then his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:35771]
[CRLMB-10048/2024]
is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
Therefore, the bail application is allowed . Accused-petitioner namely Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Choth Mal Saini, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/(Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
SAHIL SONI /11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused petitioner is entitled to bail in the FIR 512/2022.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Kumar Saini
State of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
