The court rectified clerical errors in a previous order, specifically correcting the FIR number, date of incident, and Sessions Case number to reflect the correct records.
Rectification of the order dated 07.02.2024 to correct clerical errors in FIR number, date of incident, and Sessions Case number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:9520]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Appli No. 79/2024
Hansraj S/o Shri Genaram, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Jat Hostel Ke Pass, Nokha, Dist. Bikaner.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeet Purohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
23/02/2024
(i) In para No.2 of the order, the number of FIR has been mentioned as '389/2020' instead of '398/2020'.
(ii) In para No.2 of the order, date of incident has been mentioned as '12.11.2020' instead of '12.10.2020'.
(iii) In para No.9 of the order, the number of Sessions Case has been mentioned as '14/20221' instead of '14/2021'.
[2024:RJ-JD:9520]
[CRLMA-79/2024]
(2 of 2)
(i) In para No.2 of the order, the number of FIR be read as '398/2020' instead of '389/2020'.
(ii) In para No.2 of the order, date of incident be read as '12.10.2020' instead of '12.11.2020'.
(iii) In para No.9 of the order, the number of Sessions Case be read as '14/2021' instead of '14/20221'.
(FARJAND ALI),J
521-Pramod/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether clerical errors in the prior order regarding FIR number, date of incident, and Sessions Case number require rectification?
Hansraj
State Of Rajasthan
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
