Petitioners were absent on the hearing date and had also remained absent on the earlier fixed date, failing even to comply with a direction to file documents. The High Court found no interest left in prosecuting the application and dismissed it for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:353]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 290/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
[CRLMA-290/2023]
[2024:RJ-JP:353]
(2 of 2)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
03/01/2024
;kph dh vksj ls vkt dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA iwoZ fu;r frfFk fnukad 11-09-2023 dks Hkh ;kph dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha FkkA
vkns'k fnukad 31-08-2023 dh ikyuk esa ;kph dks nLrkost izLrqr djus ds fy, funsZf'kr fd;k x;k Fkk] fdUrq ;kph dh vksj ls mldh Hkh ikyuk ugha dh xbZ gSA
,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd ;kph dh bl ;kfpdk dks pyk;s tkus esa vc dksbZ :fp 'ks"k ugha jgh gSA
vr% ;g ;kfpdk vne iSjoh esa fujLr dh tkrh gSA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
MANOJ ADWANI /31
Pinky Shankar Choudhary
Rajendra Kumar Samota
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department
Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur
Station House Officer, Police Station Phulera, Jaipur
Shravan Solanki and others (Respondents 4-14)
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
