Criminal appeal against which counsel for the appellant stated that an FIR had since been registered, rendering the appeal infructuous. The High Court accordingly dismissed the appeal as infructuous without deciding merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:31124]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 535/2024
Amit Kumar S/o Shri Brij Lal Soni, Aged About 28 Years, Ward No. 6, Saharana Vas Sadul Shahar, Dist Sri Ganganagar, Raj.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : | Mr. Himmat Jagga |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Rahul Balana | ||
| Mr. Bhupendra Soni | ||
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Sharwan Bisnhoi, PP with |
| Mr. Prakash Panwra,GA |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
29/07/2024
fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk dFku gS fd bl ekeys esa ,Qvkj drk dj fn;s tkus ls ;g vihy fu"izHkkoh gks xbZ gSA
rnuqlkj] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy fu"izHkkoh gks tkus ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
129-S N LOHRA/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal survives after registration of an FIR in the matter, making it infructuous?
Amit Kumar
State Of Rajasthan
Neetu Devi Alias Geeta Devi
Yogendra Kumar Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
