Allowed

Raghuveer Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Apr 2024CRLAS/393/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Connected appeals against rejection of bail applications under the SC/ST Act and penal code provisions arising from FIR No. 58/2024 at Jodhpur. The court granted bail to all eight appellants subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; impugned trial-court orders dated 05-03-2024 and 29-02-2024 set aside; release on Rs. 1 lakh personal bond plus two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Raghuveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Caste Atrocities | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:15074]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 530/2024

¶4

Hanuman S/o Shri Goparam, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dewasiyo Ka Bas, Doli, P.s. Jhawar Dist. Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged At Central Jail, Jodhpur)

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

Ravindra S/o Magraj, R/o Keru, P.S. Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Jodhpur.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 393/2024

¶12

Raghuveer Singh S/o Shri Sawai Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Lathi District Jaisalmer (Rajasthan).

¶13

(Petitioner Presently Lodged In Central Jail Jodhpur)

¶14

----Appellant

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶17

Ravindra S/o Shri Magraj, Aged About 20 Years, R/o House No. Keroo, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar Jodhpur City West, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)

¶18

----Respondents

¶19

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 394/2024

¶20

Sohan Ram @ Chhota S/o Hanuman Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Keru, Police Station Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, Jodhpur.

¶21

Sohan Ram S/o Koja Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Keru, Police Station Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, Jodhpur. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail Jodhpur)

¶22

----Appellants

¶23

Versus

¶24

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶25

Ravindra S/o Mag Raj, R/o Keru, Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, Jodhpur City West, Rajasthan.

¶26

----Respondents

¶27

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 429/2024

¶28

Sumer Singh S/o Babu Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Patviyo Ka Bas, Ghantiyala, PS Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, Jodhpur.

¶29

Ajay Pal Singh S/o Ram Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Mahajano Ka Bas, Utamber, PS Balesar, Jodhpur.

¶30

Sanwar Ram S/o Sukha Ram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Meghwalo Ka Bas, Ravar, PS Kaparda, Jodhpur.

(2 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JD:15074]

[CRLAS-530/2024]

(Lodged In Central Jail Jodhpur)

¶35

----Appellants

¶36

Versus

¶37

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶38

Ravindra S/o Mag Raj, R/o Keru, Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, Jodhpur City West, Raj.

¶39

----Respondents

¶40

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 430/2024

¶41

Mahendra S/o Arjun Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ravar, PS Kaprada, Dist Jodhpur Rural. (Lodged In Central Jail Jodhpur)

¶42

----Appellant

¶43

Versus

¶44

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶45

Ravindra S/o Mag Raj, R/o Keru, Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, Jodhpur City West, Raj

¶46

----Respondents

¶47

For Appellant(s)	: Mr. Ramesh Dewasi
	Mr. Hanuman Ram
	Mr. Firoz Khan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sharwan Kumar, PP
	Mr. DK Godara

¶48

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶49

Order

¶50

04/04/2024

¶51

1- izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls ;g nkf.Md vihys vUrxZr /kkjk 14,¼2½ vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e]1989 iqfyl Fkkuk jktho xka/kh uxj ftyk tks/kiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 58@2024] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 427] 447] 307 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 3¼1½¼R½¼S½] 3¼2½¼V½ vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tutkfr¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e]1989 ds ekeys esa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk fujLr fd;s tkus ds vkns”k ds fo:) izLrqr gqbZ gSA

¶52

02cgl vihy lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶53

03;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k dk rdZ jgk fd izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k fiNys djhc ,d ekg ls vf/kd le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA ekSds ij dksbZ Qk;j vkeZ ls Qk;j ds laca/k esa lcwr cjken ugha gq, gSaA bl

[2024:RJ-JD:15074]

[CRLAS-530/2024]

(3 of 3)

ekeys esa /kkjk 307 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds laca/k esa dksbZ xaHkhj pksV vkuk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds vkns'k esa vafdr ugha crk;k x;k gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k dks tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶58

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd fo}ku vf/koDrk eqLrxhl us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;kA mudk rdZ jgk fd izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k }kjk nqdku esa tslhch ykdj rksM+QksM+ djus vkSj ekSds ij Qk;j djus dk vkjksi gSA izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k egsUnz] lqesjflag o vt;ikyflag ds fo:) iwoZ esa vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij xaHkhj izd`fr dk ekeyk gksuk crkrs gq, vihy izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k [kkfjt dj tekur ij fjgk ugha fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶59

05cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA

¶60

06ifj.kkeLo:i] izkFkhZx.k&vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihys Lohdkj dh tkdj ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr ,oa vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k izdj.k½] tks/kiqj egkuxj }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 05-03-2024 o 29-02-2024 vikLr fd;s tkrs gSA vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ 1- guqeku iq= xksikjke] 2- j?kqohjflag iq= lokbZflag] 3- lksgujke mQZ NksVk iq= guqekujke 4- lksgujke iq= dkstkjke 5- lqesjflag iq= ckcwflag] 6- vt;ikyflag iq= jkeflag] 7- lkaojjke iq= lq[kkjke] 8- egsUnz iq= vtqZujke mi;qZDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ekeys esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa izR;sd izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mUgsa bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶61

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶62

671-675--S N LOHRA/-

Raghuveer Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raghuveer Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lokesh Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Keval Ram Vs State

Seema Vs State of Rajasthan

Goman Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajay Kumar Vs Jagdish

Sawai Singh @ Narayan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan