The High Court dismissed an application recalling a recorded order of the District Judge dropping proceedings. The court found no pressing need for a decision on the recalled writ application against the respondent's objection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 937/2024
Smt. Geeta W/o Sitaram
----Petitioner
Versus Ratan Lal S/o Laxman ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K N Tiwari, Adv. For : Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
20/09/2024
;g vkosnu ,dy ihB flfoy fofo/k vihy la[;k 748@22 dks iqu% uEcj ij ysus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ftl ij lquk x;kA
ih ,Q uksfVl vkfn is'k ugha djus ij U;k;ky; ds vkns'kksa dh ikyuk esa fnukad 07-08-24 dks mijksDr vihy [kkfjt gqbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd os Hkfo"; esa le; ij ih ,Q uksfVl izLrqr dj nsaxsA izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fu.kZ; dh vko';drk crk;h A
;|fi /kkjk 5 e;kn vf/kfu;e dk izkFkZuk i= Hkh is'k gqvk gS] ysfdu orZeku vkosnu ifjlhek vof/k esa gS] vr% ml ij vkns'k dh vko';drk ugha gSA
vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls iquLFkkZiu izkFkZuk i= esa vafdr dkj.kksa dks n`f"VXkr j[krs gq, ;g iquLFkkZiu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj
(2 of 2)
[CRES-937/2024]
fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ,dyihB flfoy fofo/k vihy la[;k 748@22 dks iqu% uECkj ij fy;s tkus ds vkns'k fn;s tkrs gSA dk;kZy; izdj.k esa vkxkeh dk;Zokgh djsA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /146
1 issue framed by the court
petitioner prayed for hearing of Civil Writ Application 748/22 which was recalled on 07/08/24 and proceedings dropped.
Smt. Geeta W/o Sitaram
Ratan Lal S/o Laxman
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
