In this restoration application, the Court allowed the re-admission of an appeal set aside due to lack of notices, observing that service on respondents and representation by counsel were complete based on prior files.
Appeal restored to original number and listed for admission on 27.03.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:12751]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No.87/2024
United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office At Station Road, Barmer, Through Its Authorized Signatory Of United India Insurance Company, Divisional Office At Jodhpur. (Insurer Of Vehicle)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. TRS Sodha |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Gunjan Khatri |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
18/03/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JD:12751]
[CRES-87/2024]
passed. As the said notices were not filed, the appeal was dismissed in pursuance to the said order.
(REKHA BORANA),J
313-KashishS/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present restoration application should be allowed despite non-filing of requisite notices obviating dismissal of the appeal.
Whether the service of notices under Section 5 of the Limitation Act warranting admission of the appeal was complete.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
United India Insurance Company
Sanjay Ramawat
Kewal Chand
Mahendra Singh
Thakra Ram
Bharmal Ram
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
