The High Court at Jodhpur allowed a restoration application to reinstate an appeal that was wrongly dismissed due to an unmet procedural defect. The respondent insurer did not object to the restoration.
Restoration application allowed; appeal restored to original number and listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 85/2023
Ajay Jain
----Petitioner
| Versus |
|---|
Abhishek Jain & Anr.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Mohd. Rasheed for |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. | Deepak Menaria | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Devendra Singh Chouhan |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
17/01/2024
(2 of 2) [CRES-85/2023]
(REKHA BORANA),J
222-KashishS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a restoration application should be allowed when the appellate order was passed due to a procedural defect not cured within the stipulated time.
Ajay Jain
Abhishek Jain & Anr.
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
