Deepnath v. U.P.S.R.T. Corp.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court allowed restoration of SBCMA No.2082/2015 dismissed after default, subject to deposit of Rs.3,000 cost before Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority.
What did the court decide?
Restoration of miscellaneous appeal SBCMA No.2082/2015 to its original number on payment of Rs.3,000 deposit.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:27112]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 84/2018
IN
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.2082/2015
- 1 Deepnath S/o Jethnath, Aged 10 years.
- Kaluram S/o Suratnath,, Aged About 56 Years, Tehsil - Pachpadra, District Barmer
- Chadki Devi W/o Kalunath, Aged About 54 Years, Tehsil - Pachpadra, District Barmer
----Petitioners
- Versus
- Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation, Aalambagh, Lucknow (U.p.) Through General Manager.
- Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation, Aalambagh, Lucknow (U.p.) Through Regional Manager.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the miscellaneous appeal ought to be restored to its original number despite non-compliance with a peremptory order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Deepnath
- petitioner
Kaluram
- petitioner
Chadki Devi
- respondent
Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation
- respondent
Iftekaar Khan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRES/84/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court