Court upheld an order of 31.10.2023 restoring a restoration application subject to a Rs. 5,000 fee, noting the receipt was not deposited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:37830]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 80/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Kumar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
06/09/2024
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are not in his contact.
This Court vide order dated 31.10.2023 directed to restore the appeal to its original number subject to deposition of cost of Rs. 5,000/-.
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:37830]
[CRES-80/2020]
As per office report, receipt regarding deposition of cost of Rs. 5,000/- as imposed by this Court vide order dated 31.10.2023 has not been submitted so far.
In this view of the matter, when the order dated 31.10.2023 is self-explanatory, no further order is required to be passed in this matter.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Ritu/216
Rajendra Kumar S/o Hari Singh and others
Superintending Engineer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and others
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
