The High Court of Rajasthan allowed condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for filing a restoration application. The court restored the miscellaneous appeal SBCMA No.1991/2011 to its original number without imposing costs.
Condonation of delay allowed; miscellaneous appeal SBCMA No.1991/2011 restored to original number; no costs imposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:35375]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 50/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Nishant | Motsara |
|---|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Mahesh | Joshi for resp.No.3 |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order
27/08/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:35375]
[CRES-50/2020]
(2 of 2)
application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act upon the respondents is complete.
(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J
89-Ravi Khandelwal/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is warranted restoration of a dismissed miscellaneous appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sulochana Devi and others
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Nupur Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
