In an appeal against a limitation order, the court dismissed the application for restoration of suits due to non-prosecution and failure to file necessary applications despite granted extensions and notices.
The present restoration application is dismissed in non-prosecution as well as in non-compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:8039]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 223/2011
Smt.jeevni And Anr.
----Petitioners
Versus
Sanjeev Kumar And Ors.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
15/02/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:8039]
[CRES-223/2011]
(2 of 2)
dismissed in non-prosecution as well as in non-compliance.
(REKHA BORANA),J
56-KashishS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the restoration application is barred due to non-compliance and non-prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Jeevni And Anr.
Sanjeev Kumar And Ors.
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
