Rajni Yadav W/O Late Sh. Lal Chand Yadav D/O Sh. Rudmal, Vs Ramlal Yadav S/O Late Sh. Gheesalal Yadav

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that there was a dispute between the petitioner and her husband who has expired. Now her father-in-law and brother-in-law are unnecessarily creating hurdles in applicant seeking appointment in Government service and they have lodged 7 cases against her.

¶15

For the grounds mentioned in the D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Leave to Application, the same is allowed.

¶16

Office is directed to register the present D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Leave to Application as D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application.

¶17

[CMLAP-2/2024]

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

After registering the same, office is directed to show the name of Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma, learned counsel in the cause list as counsel for the respondent.

¶20

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶21

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶22

LAKSHYA-DAKSH/27

Rajni Yadav W/O Late Sh. Lal Chand Yadav D/O Sh. Rudmal, v. Ramlal Yadav S/O Late Sh. Gheesalal Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajni Yadav W/O Late Sh. Lal Chand Yadav D/O Sh. Rudmal, v. Ramlal Yadav S/O Late Sh. Gheesalal Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K C Bakliwal Vs National Council of Educationa

Government of Rajasthan Vs Vijay Galav

M/S Kec International Ltd. Vs State Finance Departmentors

Chief Electrical Superintending Engineer (S and P) Vs Chairman, Rajasthan Micro Small Enterprises Facilitation Council

Ajmer Development Authority, Vs M/S Shekhar Construction Company

Brij Bihari Agarwal Vs Collector Stamp Jaipur