Nikhil Taneja v. N. Suresh
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order where the single judge dismissed the Civil Misc. Appeal in nonprosecution after counsel notified lack of instructions from the deceased/absent appellant.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed in nonprosecution.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:13235]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 682/2019
Nikhil Taneja S/o Shri Rajendra Taneja, Aged About 38 Years, B/c Arora, R/o Ward No. 13 (New Ward No. 18), Suratgarh Through His Father And Next Friend Rajendra Taneja S/o Shri Gulab Rai Taneja, B/c Arora, R/o Ward No. 13 (New Ward No. 18) Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar.
----Appellant
Versus
- N. Suresh S/o Sh. Nansampa, B/c Hindu, R/o Village Badrawati Police Station New Town District Simohar (Karnataka) Second Address - At Present Driver No. 2604136211. Madras Regiment Cant Suratgarh C/o 56 Apo. (Driver Truck No. 05 D-163456-K-306)
- Commandant 11 Madras Regiment, Suratgarh Can C/o 56 Apo.
- Union Of India, Through Its Secretary Ministry Of Defense, New Delhi. (Owner Truck No. 05 D- 163459-K306)
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Aakash Kukkar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nikhil Taneja
- respondent
N. Suresh
- respondent
Commandant 11 Madras Regiment
- respondent
Union Of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/682/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court