The High Court allowed the appeal in a share market insurance case where the compensation awarded by the lower court was found to be unduly reduced due to an incorrect application of limitation period rules.
The compensation was increased to 9,90,154/- rupees instead of the earlier 6,96,722/- rupees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:13048]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5646/2017
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Anil Yadav, Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. | |
| For | : Mr. Amarnath Pareek, Adv. |
| Respondent(s) |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
15/03/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:13048]
(2 of 5) [CMA-5646/2017]
[email protected] ¼vkxs nkosnkj dgk tkosxk½ }kjk ;g vihy fo}ku eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k Vksad }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k 1992@2014¼496@2014½ esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa vokMZ fnukad 19-08-2017 ¼vkxs vk{ksfir vokMZ dgk tkosxk½ ls O;fFkr gksdj izfrdj jkf'k esa c<ksrjh gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA
vk{ksfir vokMZ ds ek/;e ls nkosnkjku dks v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk dqy 6]96]722@& :i;s dk iapkV 7-5 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr ikfjr fd;k x;k gS tks fuEukuqlkj gS&
| dze | en | jkf'k |
|---|---|---|
| 1- | vkfJrrk dh vk; gkfu | 5]50]368@& |
| 2- | dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu | 1]25]000@& |
| 3- | vafre laLdkj ds en esa | 15]000@& |
| 4- | bZykt O;; | 6354@& |
| dqy izfrdj jkf'k | 6]96]722@& |
bl izdj.k esa vkjksfir okgu ds Lokeh@pkyd vFkok chek daiuh }kjk dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh x;h gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k }kjk fuosnu fd;k x;k fd vkfJrrk dh vk; gkfu dh x.kuk djrs le; U;kf;d n"VkUr y{eh/kj uk;d o vU; cuke tqxyfd'kksj o vU; 2018¼1½ vkj-,-vkj- 45 ,l-lh- esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj 26 fnu ds LFkku ij 30 fnu ds vuqlkj x.kuk fd;k tkuk visf{kr gS] tcfd v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk 26 fnu dh etnwjh nj ds vuqlkj izfrdj jkf'k dh x.kuk dh gS] Hkfo"; esa vk; of) dk ykHk Hkh ugha fn;k x;k gS] blds vfrfjDr lEink dh gkfu ds
(3 of 5) [CMA-5646/2017]
[2024:RJ-JP:13048]
en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyk;h gS] tks ;Fkksfpr jkf'k fnyk;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
blds foijhr izR;FkhZ la[;k&4@chek dEiuh dh vksj ls v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds vkns'k dks fof/klEer gksuk crk;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
?kVuk fnukad 18-09-2014 dh gS] erd cUusflag dh okgu nq?kZVuk esa eR;q gksuk fooknjfgr gS] rRle; erd dh vk;q 43 o"kZ Fkh rFkk mldh dksbZ izekf.kr vk; ugha FkhA mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vdq'ky Jfed dh ekfld vk; 4914@& :i;s ds vk/kkj ij izfrdj jkf'k dh x.kuk dh x;h gS] tcfd rRle; izfrfnu etnwjh nj 189@& :i;s Fkh rFkk U;kf;d n"VkUr y{eh/kj uk;d o vU; cuke tqxyfd'kksj o vU; ¼mijksDr½ esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj 30 fnu ds vuqlkj izfrdj jkf'k gh fnyk;k tkuk mfpr gSA rnuqlkj erd dh ekfld etnwjh 189x30=5670@& :i;s gksrh gS] erd ij nks nkosnkj vkfJr Fks] vr% erd ds thfor jgus ij Lo;a ds O;fDrxr [kpsZ o thou fuokZg ds :i esa 1@3 fgLlk jkf'k dh dVkSrh fd;s tkus o erd dh vk;q ds vk/kkj ij 14 dk xq.kd yxk;s tkus ij vk; dh gkfu ds en esa 3780x12x14=635]040@& :i;s gksrh gSA
Hkfo"; esa vk; dh izR;k'kk ds en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyk;h x;h gS] tcfd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk us'kuy ba';ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM cuke iz.k; lsBh o vU; ¼2017½ 16 ,l-lh-lh- 680 esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ds vuqlkj 25 izfr'kr Hkfo"; esa vk; o`f) ds vuqlkj 1]58]760@& :i;s
[2024:RJ-JP:13048]
(4 of 5) [CMA-5646/2017]
vihykFkhZx.k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA bl izdkj vk; dh gkfu ds en esa dqy jkf'k 7]93]800@& :i;s vkdfyr gksrh gS] bl izdkj vk; dh gkfu ds en esa vihykFkhZx.k 2]43]432@& :i;s vfrfjDr izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA
v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZx.k dks erd ds izse&Lusg] laj{k.k] lkgp;Z vkfn ds oafpr gksus dh en esa dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu ds :i esa dqy 1]25]000@& :i;s fnyk;s x;s gSa] tcfd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n"Vkar Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130 esa ikfjr fl)kar ds vuqlkj izR;sd nkosnkj 40]000@&:i;s vFkkZr dqy 1]60]000@&:i;s izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSA bl izdkj bl en esa 35]000@& :i;s dh c<ksRrjh gksus ;ksX; gSA
laink dh gkfu ds en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyk;h x;h gS] tcfd nkosnkj bl en esa 15]000@& :i;s vfrfjDr :i ls izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA
esfMdy fcy ds laca/k esa v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk fnyk;h x;h jkf'k i;kZIr gS ftlesa gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA
mijksDr foospukuqlkj tks v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk tks 6]96]722@&:i;s dk vokMZ ikfjr fd;k x;k gS mlds LFkku ij 2]93]432@& :i;s dh c<ksRrjh gksdj [email protected] 9]90]154@&:i;s izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA
rn~uqlkj ;g vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj vk{ksfir vokMZ dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, [email protected]
(5 of 5) [CMA-5646/2017]
[2024:RJ-JP:13048]
ds i{k esa dqy 9]90]154@&:i;s dk vokMZ ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vihykFkhZXk.k }kjk iwoZ esa izkIr dh x;h jkf'k dks iapkV jkf'k esa ls lek;ksftr fd;k tkosxkA
bl vkns'k }kjk c<kbZ xbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ij ewy ;kfpdk nk;j djus dh frfFk ls olwyh rd vihykFkhZx.k 7-5 izfr'kr okf"kZd lk/kkj.k dh nj ls C;kt izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gaSA
v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /44
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the compensation awarded by the court below was legally sustainable under the Limitation Act in view of the statutory extension of the period for service of summons.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors.Referred¶36
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Kewal W/o Banney Singh B/c Sonsi and others
Ashok Rai and others
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
