Appellant challenged an order upholding the High Court's decision conferring representative right to the adopted son in a succession matter, dismissing the appeal.
The s.c. civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:51639]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3674/2007
Dheer Singh adopted son of late Shri Nathua Lal Bansal, aged about 26 years, resident of Bargama, Tehsil Hindaun, District Karauli.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shiv Singh Meena, Adv. For : None Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
16/12/2024
vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g vihy fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] fg.MkSu flVh ¼djkSyh½ }kjk nhokuh fofo/k ¼mRrjkf/kdkj izek.k&i=½ la[;k 36@2005 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 23-07-2007 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gSA
izR;FkhZ i{k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gS] fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dks lquk x;kA
[CMA-3674/2007]
[2024:RJ-JP:51639]
(2 of 3)
bl izdj.k esa ;g fooknjfgr fLFkfr gS fd uFkqvkyky caly jktdh; ek/;fed fo|ky;] >kjsMk esa iz/kkuk/;kid Fks] mudh nks iqf=;ka dq0 iwue rFkk dqlqensoh gqbZa] uFkqvkyky dh eR;q fnukad 20-08-2005 dks gksuk Hkh fooknfgr gSA fookn ;gka ls izkjEHk gksrk gS fd vihykFkhZ /khjflag }kjk erd dh eR;q ds mijkUr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k ;g vfHkdfFkr fd;k fd erd uFkqvkyky }kjk mls cpiu esa gh xksn ys fy;k Fkk] og mldk xksniq= gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa uFkqvkyky dh Hkkjrh; thou chek fuxe dh ikWfylh ds rgr izkIr gksus okyh jkf'k rFkk lsok&ifjykHk vihykFkhZ /khjflag rFkk mldh cfgu dq0 iwue izkIr djusdh vf/kdkjh gS ftlds fy, cMh cfgu dqlqensoh dks dksbZ vkifRr ugha gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk nksuksa i{kksa dks lquus ds mijkUr /khjflag dks e`rd dk nRrd iq= gksuk fookfnr ekurs gq, dq0 iwue ds i{k esa tek'kqnk jkf'k ds laca/k esa mRrjkf/kdkj izek.k i= tkjh fd;k ftlls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g vihy izLrqr dh x;hA
okLro esa erd uFkqvkyky }kjk /khjflag dks fnukad 20-06-1994 dks xksn ys fy;k gksrk rks uFkqvkyky }kjk viuh eR;q fnukad 20-08-2005 ls iwoZ lsok&vfHkys[k esa /khjflag dks vius iq= ds :i esa vo'; nf'kZr djrk vkSj /khjflag ds 'kS{kf.kd nLrkostksa esa mlds firk dk uke uFkqvkyky mYysf[kr gksrk] ysfdu bl laca/k esa dksbZ nLrkosth lk{; izLrqr ugha gqbZ gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk /khjflag dks e`rd dk nRrd iq= izekf.kr ugha ekudj mldh tk;Unk iq=h ds i{k esa
(3 of 3) [CMA-3674/2007]
[2024:RJ-JP:51639]
mRrjkf/kdkj izek.k i= vihyk/khu vkns'k ds ek/;e ls tkjh fd;k gSA
/kkjk 372 Hkkjrh; mRrjkf/kdkj ds ekeyksa esa erd dh py lEifRr izkIr djus gsrq loksZRre O;fDr dkSu gS] bl ckcr~ laf{kIr tkap dh tkdj vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dh vis{kk gS rFkk fdlh Hkh i{kdkj ds vf/kdkj vafre :i ls fu.khZr ugha gksrs gSaA orZeku ekeys esa erd dh iq=h gh e`rd dh tek'kqnk jkf'k dks izkIr djus dh loksZRre vf/kdkjh ekuh x;h gS tks mfpr gS vkSj bl dlkSVh ij ns[kk tkos rks vihyk/khu fu.kZ; iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS ftleas gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dh dksbZ vko';drk ugha gSA
ifj.kker% izLrqr vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vihyk/khu fu.kZ; fnukad 23-07-2007 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDr izdkj ls vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal/66
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court correctly treated the adopted son as the representative heir despite the absence of actual guardianship for the adopted child.
Dheer Singh
Smt. Kushum Devi
Poonam
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
