Civil miscellaneous appeal dismissed in the absence of the appellant, as proof-of-filing and notice documents had long remained unfiled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:165]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3499/2011
Vikram Singh Meena
----Appellant
Versus
Hari Narain Choudhary And Others
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : None present For : Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
02/01/2024
vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izR;FkhZx.k dh rkehy gsrq ih-,Q- o uksfVl yEcs le; ls izLrqr ugha fd;s tk jgs gSa] vkt vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr Hkh ugha gSA
vr% vihy vihykFkhZ dh vuqifLFkfr esa [kkfjt dh tkrh
gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /171
Vikram Singh Meena
Hari Narain Choudhary
Others
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
