The High Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal for non-prosecution and non-compliance with directions to file the requisite process fee and notices under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, despite multiple extensions granted. The application under Section 5 was also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:9220]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3168/2011
Lrs Of Satyanarayan And Anr
----Appellants
Versus
Sharwan Kumar And Ors
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None present
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
22/02/2024
(2 of 2) [CMA-3168/2011]
[2024:RJ-JD:9220]
dismissed.
(REKHA BORANA),J
34-AbhishekK/devanshi-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellants have prosecuted the appeal and complied with procedural requirements within the stipulated time?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lrs Of Satyanarayan And Anr
Sharwan Kumar And Ors
REKHA BORANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
