Papparam v. Ganga
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant's appeal was dismissed for non-compliance and non-prosecution. The appeal was found to be barred by limitation, and no application for condonation of delay was filed. The defects pointed out by the office were not cured within the granted time.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:3355]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 313/2023
Papparam S/o Shri Bhomaram, Aged About 40 Years, By Caste Meghwal, R/o Sekhala, Tehsil Shergarh, Distt. Jodhpur,. (Driver Of Vehicle No. Rj-19-Sp-4432)
----Appellant
Versus
- Ganga W/o Late Shri Birdaram, Aged About 41 Years, By Caste Meghwal, Resident Of Sekhala, Tehsil Shergarh, Distt. Jodhpur.
- Narayanram S/o Late Shri Birdaram, Aged About 21 Years, By Caste Meghwal, Resident Of Sekhala, Tehsil Shergarh, Distt. Jodhpur.
- Hemi D/o Late Shri Birdaram, Aged About 20 Years, By Caste Meghwal, Resident Of Sekhala, Tehsil Shergarh, Distt. Jodhpur.
- Rugharam S/o Late Shri Birdaram, Aged About 17 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Ganga, By Caste Meghwal, Resident Of Sekhala, Tehsil Shergarh, Distt. Jodhpur.
- Jasu D/o Late Shri Birdaram, Aged About 16 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Ganga, By Caste Meghwal, Resident Of Sekhala, Tehsil Shergarh, Distt. Jodhpur.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed by the vehicle driver is barred by limitation?
Whether the defects in the appeal were cured within the stipulated time?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Papparam S/o Shri Bhomaram
- respondent
Ganga W/o Late Shri Birdaram
- respondent
Narayanram S/o Late Shri Birdaram
- respondent
Hemi D/o Late Shri Birdaram
- respondent
Rugharam S/o Late Shri Birdaram
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/313/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court