Dismissed
Hazari v. Foru
Rajasthan HCCFA/832/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this civil appeal, the High Court held that due to the death of appellants and failure to bring legal representatives on record, the appeal stands abated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
¶2
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 832/2004
¶3
- Hazari S/o Dhanna
¶4
- Hanuman S/o Sheoraj
¶5
Both R/o Fatehganz @ Parasia, Tehsil Uniaria, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
¶6
----Appellants
¶7
Versus
¶8
- Foru alleged adopted son late Shivpal @ Sheopal, R/o Fatehganz @ Parasia, Tehsil Uniaria, District Tonk.
¶9
- Ramesh S/o Hazari.
¶10
- Rambilas S/o Hukma.
¶11
- Bheru S/o Manna
¶12
All R/o Fatehganz @ Parasia, Tehsil Uniaria, District Tonk, Rajasthan.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Hazari S/o Dhanna
- appellant
Hanuman S/o Sheoraj
- respondent
Foru alleged adopted son late Shivpal @ Sheopal
- respondent
Ramesh S/o Hazari
- respondent
Rambilas S/o Hukma
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CFA/832/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court