Allowed
Abdul Sattar v. Jitendra Singh
Rajasthan HCCFA/402/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Civil First Appeal decided on compromise. Compromise verified by Dy. Registrar (Judicial). Pending applications also decided by consent.
What did the court decide?
Settlement verified between the parties.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2024:RJ-JD:28736]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 402/2005
¶4
Abdul Sattar
¶5
----Appellant
¶6
Versus
¶7
Jitendra Singh
¶8
----Respondent
¶9
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. DD Chitlangi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. D.S. Pidiyar |
| Mr. Raman Rathore |
¶10
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
¶11
Order
¶12
15/07/2024
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Abdul Sattar
- respondent
Jitendra Singh
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CFA/402/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court