The appellant landlord filed a civil appeal seeking possession. The respondent tenant subsequently handed over vacant possession of the suit premises, rendering the appeal infructuous. The court disposed of the appeal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:47574]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 238/2000
----Appellant
Versus
1.Ashok Kumar Agarwal Sole proprietor, Ashoka Enterprises, 3, Jayanti Market, Mirja Ismaiil Road, Jaipur City Jaipur
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. N. K. Singhal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwardhan Tolani, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
20/11/2024
Matter comes up on an application (I.A. No.1/2024) under Section 151 CPC.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondenttenant has handed over the vacant possession of the suit premises. So, the Civil First Appeal has been rendered infructuous.
It is accordingly disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /131
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hari Shankar Taluka
Smt. Chando Devi
Ashok Kumar Agarwal
Ashoka Enterprises
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
