The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a Civil First Appeal due to the appellant's absence in two court rounds and the explicit lack of intent to prosecute the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:16220]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 149/1994
Nagarmal S/o Shri Murlidharji, R/o 31 Stadium Shopping Centre, Jodhpur
----Appellant
Versus
Khadi Audhyogic Utpadak Sahkari Samiti Limited, Balotra
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
15/04/2024
Nobody has appeared on behalf of appellant even in the second round. Nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant on 18.03.2024 and 27.03.2024.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
43-neha/-
Nagarmal S/o Shri Murlidharji
Khadi Audhyogic Utpadak Sahkari Samiti Limited, Balotra
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
