Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a writ court direction to decide the petitioner's representation before the PLPC within three months. Respondents stated PLPC considered the matter and would pass an order within three months; the petition was disposed of on that statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:47444-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 207/2024
In
D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL)No. 10640/2023
Nagendra Pareek Son Of Shri Bajrang Lal Pareek, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Rampura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.Shri Qummer Ul Zaman Choudhary, District Collector Sikar (Raj.)
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Ajay Gupta with Ms. Sampati Sharma |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Manoj Kumar, |
| Ms. Pooja Dixit for | |
| Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
19/11/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:47444-DB]
[CCP-207/2024]
petitioner is at liberty to make a representation before PLPC and the respondents are directed to decide the same within a period of three months.”
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Mohita/Riya/36
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents wilfully disobeyed the Court's direction dated 20.07.2023 to decide the petitioner's representation before the PLPC within three months.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jagdish Prashad Meena (supra)Relied on
Nagendra Pareek
Shri Qummer Ul Zaman Choudhary, District Collector Sikar
Shri Sudhansh Pant, Chief Secretary
State of Rajasthan through Pr. Secretary to Government, Revenue Department
Avneesh Jhingan
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
