Contempt petition alleging breach of an interim order restraining dispossession from land. The court found no averment of actual dispossession after the order, held no case of contempt was made out, and dismissed the petition as withdrawn at the petitioners' request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:11026]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civ. Contempt Pet. No. 16/2022
Versus
1/ 2. Bahadur Singh S/o Late Bhanwar Singh, aged 44 years, Rabcha, Tehsil Nathdwara, District Rajsamand. 1/3. Shalu Singh S/o Late Bhanwar Singh, aged about 45 years, Rabcha, Tehsil Nathdwara, District Rajsamand. 1/ 4. Hansha Kanwar W/o Late Bhanwar Singh, aged about 60 years, Rabcha, Tehsil Nathdwara, District Rajsamand.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
C.S. Kotwani |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Chaitanya Kumar Gehlot |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
05/03/2024
[2024:RJ-JD:11026]
[CCP-16/2022]
(2 of 2)
(REKHA BORANA),J
647-Vij/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether breach of the interim order dated 20.11.2021 restraining dispossession amounted to contempt.
Balwant Singh
Indra Singh
Narayan Singh
Dilip Singh
Bahadur Singh
Shalu Singh
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
