This single-line order holds that the special leave to appeal or writ petition has become infructuous and dismisses it accordingly. The court leaves the respondents to pass appropriate orders in the future. No substantive legal proposition other than the procedural disposal is found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:50597]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4473/2024
Nitesh Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Yuvraj Sadan, 2, Near Water Tank, Talwandi, POIL Town Ship, Kota (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Lodha
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order
10/12/2024
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate order in future, if deems it appropriate, considering the administrative exigencies, strictly in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/17
Nitesh Kumar Yadav
Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
